this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
791 points (92.5% liked)

Leftism

2090 readers
1489 users here now

Our goal is to be the one stop shop for leftism here at lemmy.world! We welcome anyone with beliefs ranging from SocDemocracy to Anarchism to post, discuss, and interact with our community. We are a democratic community, and as such, welcome metaposts that seek to amend the rules through consensus. Post articles, videos, questions, analysis and more. As long as it's leftist, it's welcome here!

Rules:

Posting Expectations:

Sister Communities:

!abolition@slrpnk.net !antiwork@lemmy.world !antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world !breadtube@lemmy.world !climate@slrpnk.net !fuckcars@lemmy.world !iwwunion@lemmy.ml !leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com !leftymusic@lemmy.world !privacy@lemmy.world !socialistra@midwest.social !solarpunk@slrpnk.net Solarpunk memes !therightcantmeme@midwest.social !thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world !vuvuzelaiphone@lemmy.world !workingclasscalendar@lemmy.world !workreform@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] III@lemmy.world -1 points 15 hours ago (9 children)

Seems more like a boastful "I was right" from those that ensured they were right.

[–] spacesatan@leminal.space 1 points 15 hours ago (8 children)

Maybe you should call on the candidate to have less bad positions than try to call on voters to support them despite their bad positions. For some reason 'she's electable if you vote for her' seems to keep being a losing strategy.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (7 children)

Reminder - Americans didn't just vote "no" on Kamala Harris because she had bad positions. They also voted "yes" for a guy with 34 felony convictions and almost no positions except "immigrants are bad". He vastly fails the standard you're applying to Harris. I think the two most likely reasons the election came out the way it did are A) it was rigged by Republicans, or B) a vast swath of America is incredibly fucking stupid. Option B seems a lot more rational to me.

[–] spacesatan@leminal.space 4 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Democratic strategists keep refusing to learn the lesson that presidential elections are about driving turnout. Centrist swing voters are a red herring and the way to win is to enthuse the base. Her positions failed to enthuse the base and so they were bad. It's much easier for the right to enthuse the base because their base is morons who are going to project whatever they believe onto the candidate as long as they dog whistle enough.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago

Trump is horrible and wrong, but he had a solid message. I could tell you what he's about in 5 minutes without having to think about it.

What could you say about Harris besides "she isn't Trump"? She wants an opportunity economy? What is that? How would it work? Why was she even running?

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world -2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Refusing to wat?? Driving voter turnout was probably the central theme of the whole Harris campaign. Maybe not in enough memes, I dunno.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago

Maybe if you get enough celebrities to endorse you, that'll drive turnout. Oh, and the Cheneys. Because everybody loves them.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)