this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
1903 points (95.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

5846 readers
2531 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What upset me the most is that Harris used Hilary's election plan verbatim.

She absolutely did not. Hillary leaned into the gender card hardcore. She had her supporters wearing t-shirts saying “I’m with her” with an arrow sign. She said “I’m not saying you should vote for me because I’m a woman, you should vote for me because of my qualifications. But one of my qualifications is…I’M A WOMAN!!!”

Kamala didn’t lean into any of this demographics, gender war trash. She (wisely) followed Barack Obama’s playbook of leaving the identify politics crap at the door. She lost for other reasons. Hillary alienated voters by leaning too hard into identity politics. Kamala ran a much better campaign than Hillary. They are not the same. Why Kamala lost will be debated for some time at least, but it will not be concluded reasonably that she lost for the same reasons Hillary lost in 2016. I know people want to conclude that women just can’t get elected, but we haven’t yet had a female candidate that ran a great campaign. As someone who wants our first female president, I have to reluctantly admit that we’ve been underserved by our female politicians thus far. I have high hopes for AOC in the future, but we’ll have to wait and see how that plays out. I don’t actually think Kamala did anything wrong in her campaign; I just think she was working against the legacy set by her predecessor, and it was too much. That, and too many American voters are stupid, ignorant, misguided voters. And, probably, some Pro-Palestinian voters had their heads up their asses.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

2020 election saw massive turnout in favour of DNC. Then Biden did as much as he could to clean up Trump's mess and make things better.

Kamala trusted that turnout, hoped people will know the work that was done, understand the threat of second Trump presidency, and vote in similar manner again.

In other words she trusted the people to be informed voters. And they backstabbed her.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Kamala trusted that turnout, hoped people will know the work that was done, understand the threat of second Trump presidency, and vote in similar manner again.

Don't forget running to the right in an attempt to court R voters (just what every D constituent wants!) who (as usual) did NOT show up for her.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Every fucking election 'moderate' Republicans play the part of Lucy and Dems play the part of Charlie Brown

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And here I am thinking Lucy is establishment dems and Charlie Brows is progressives.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

That would also fit.

Another would be Charlie as people who want police reform and Lucy being the Dems.

[–] dditty@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

And she lost a race against the clock by starting her campaign in the eleventh hour. Those Google search trends showed that somehow a nonzero amount of voters didn't even know she was the candidate and Biden had dropped out.

So many different variables in the mix make this election hard to compare to prior elections like 2016.