this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
988 points (98.3% liked)

Programming Humor

2662 readers
2 users here now

Related Communities !programmerhumor@lemmy.ml !programmer_humor@programming.dev !programmerhumor@kbin.social !programming_horror@programming.dev

Other Programming Communities !programming@beehaw.org !programming@programming.dev !programming@lemmy.ml !programming@kbin.social !learn_programming@programming.dev !functional_programming@programming.dev !embedded_prog@lemmy.ml

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
2e8a9d6bb6935a54@lemmy.world
988
checkmate (slrpnk.net)
submitted 1 week ago by blibla@slrpnk.net to c/programminghumor@lemmy.world
147 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mango@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't think that's nearly enough to make it better.

[–] lastunusedusername2@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago (3 children)

If I had to use GIMP again I'd just kill myself.

Then again, I sure wouldn't pay for photoshop, either.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

While we're making unpopular statements about free software: Audacity is the GIMP of the audio-editing world. REAPER is where it's at.

[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 1 points 6 days ago

I have both gimp and Photoshop and for the grand majority of things that I need to do minor photo editing, gimp is my preferred choice.

Sure, the interface is simplistic, but it works really well once you learn how to make it work, at least for my specific needs.

I will follow that up by saying that I am not a graphic designer and nothing that I make is published to the public, but despite that I actually enjoy using gimp.