this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
107 points (95.7% liked)

entertainment

91 readers
51 users here now

founded 1 year ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atro_city@fedia.io -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s a way to oppress everyone

Ask yourself who benefits from this and you might find out it's not a "patriarchy".

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nobody really benefits as a demographic as a whole. It leads to mens higher suicide rates, prevents women from fully realizing their potential, and precludes the existence of NB people. Individuals benefit in various ways, for example: men receive higher pay and women receive more emotional support. I (AFAB) “benefit” from women’s parking spots that exist because of rape culture, but is that really a win?

[–] atro_city@fedia.io -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's really no section of the population that benefits from infighting between the sexes? No section that benefits by distracting large parts of the population by having them focus on their perceived differences? No group that can afford to influence the narrative, conditions, and perceptions to their benefit? No group comes to mind?

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Why don’t you just tell me what you think instead of making me guess.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I believe they pointing at the rich again. As everyone does once you drill down into most inequalities enough.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

If they are, I disagree. Peter Thiel, Mark Zuckerberg, and Elon Musk are all very clearly affected by the patriarchy. For older money, Barbara Bush, Jackie Onassis, and FDR were clearly harmed by the patriarchy.