this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
67 points (92.4% liked)

Programming

17020 readers
268 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] andscape@feddit.it 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

Legacy COBOL code is largely used in critical systems like those of banks and airlines. What could go wrong with having that code rewritten by stochastic parrots who get programming answers wrong half of the time?

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

That's assuming they're using one of the generic models like ChatGPT and not something custom they've created specifically to do this.

Edit: they are in fact using their own as per the article

[–] ImpossibleRubiksCube@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's good to see that they aren't just piping through GPT-whatever, but in my experience, the vast majority of people who tout AI, even at large corporations, generally have zero idea how it works. I'm still not convinced that this is a good idea.

I mostly use A.I. to translate. ChatGPT gets that done it gets it done pretty good, especially when you say “translate this mandarin text into English. I don’t care if it is somewhat inaccurate, just do it as best as you can.“

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)