Psychology

465 readers

37 users here now

A place for articles, discussions and questions about psychology – the science of mind and behavior. It is a multidisciplinary field, covering behavioral, cognitive, developmental, educational, neuro-biological, personality, and social studies (and more!).

Rules:

Do not take or give direct medical advice in your posts or comments.
Absolutely no bigotry, hate speech or discrimination. That includes (but is not limited to) ableism, antisemitism, islamophobia, queer*- and LGBTQIA*-phobia, racism, and sexism.
Keep discussions in good faith and be respectful.
Posts should be related to academic, applied or clinical psychology in some way.
Titles should be relevant to the content and not misleading.
Do not post links to your own surveys, spam or self-help tips/videos.

Friends and related communities:

Banner: "A cross section of a mouse brain stained with cortical layer specific proteins" by Mamunur Rashid, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons / height edited to fit as banner

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

nBee@lemmy.ml

What would you suggest if you were helping design a healthier social network? (lemmy.eco.br)

submitted 1 day ago by subhomesickalien@lemmy.eco.br to c/psychology@lemmy.ml

51 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For example, would removing infinite scrolling help make it less addictive? Would you keep the upvote/downvote system, remove it, or classify posts differently to foster better discussions? How about adding a countdown timer to log the user out after a certain number of hours of use?

If psychological research can be used to keep users engaged on a social network for as long as possible, I believe it can also be applied to help prevent excessive use, improve the quality of discussions, and create a more empathetic environment. That’s why I’d love to hear suggestions from those in the field.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Jentu@lemmy.ml 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Would you also want to ban URLs even though they are technically just text? I also wonder if a social media site this limited would be able to survive when up against websites that are designed to be as addictive as possible. Actually, how does any non-addictive site compete with that and survive? My only guess is that it'd have to actually make people feel good about themselves and be less lonely. Fight addiction with a better emotion instead.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

No, I'm fine with links if the thumbnails aren't big images. It's making a meme the entire post that I think is what makes the internet worst

I'm not proposing a POPULAR social media site, of course.

[–] Jentu@lemmy.ml 1 points 16 hours ago

Ohh gotcha! I do think images would be fine if there was some way to verify original content since there are some truly amazing creators out there. But yeah, that'd likely require constant moderation.