Asklemmy

43944 readers

484 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

309

What is an absurdity that has been normalized by society? (midwest.social)

submitted 1 year ago by Lanky_Pomegranate530@midwest.social to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

426 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

A government could be good. In theory:

one year terms for elected individuals in public offices
no second term
getting elected is a random draw (akin to jury duty) based on the individuals' capabilities
authority limited in scope within city states

I'm sure there's other ideas regarding this.

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

getting elected is a random draw (akin to jury duty) based on the individuals' capabilities

Who asseses people's capabilities in this system? As they are likely the most powerful people.

[–] monk@lemmy.unboiled.info 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

With 1 year and no second term they're just gonna steal everything within their reach from day 1, so we need to balance it with:

all public servants live under full transparency, 24/7 body cams etc for years after, financial transparency for life
2x to all prison sentences while serving
a well-oiled practice to jail everyone who ain't a total saint

Then, maybe.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It'd need to be a system that automates itself instead of needing surveillance. Something that simply disincentivizes corruption.

[–] monk@lemmy.unboiled.info 1 points 1 year ago

How about "if you accept the bribe, report it and do nothing, you can keep it"?

[–] uralsolo@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

If you don't change the economic system then you'll just run into exactly the same problems as we already have. The one year term elected officials will be handed pre-written legislation by corporations, they'll be heavily incentivized to pass it, if they don't it'll be a short turn around before the people with Capital can try again, and if they instead try to pass their own legislation that Capital doesn't approve of it they'll get the next person to undo it.