this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
717 points (99.0% liked)

People Twitter

5274 readers
1010 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
717
Evil company vs artist (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 3 days ago by Joker@sh.itjust.works to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
56 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Mastodon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I don't necessarily agree with the person you responded to, and I could be wrong here but I don't really think Banksy is actually invoking their copyrights, just using it as an idea to criticize private property in general. Similar to how your own "god given copyright" is in itself a criticism. It's more like, "look our property laws that are meant to protect the art-maker mean nothing to big companies. Why should the property laws that are meant protect big companies mean anything to us?"

I get how you could see it as hypocritical, but I think fundamentally Banksy probably isn't advocating for stronger copyright laws here...

[โ€“] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This it it. Banksy's not demanding money there. What's noted is that Guess has decided to join in and therefore its property is publicly up for grabs.