this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
912 points (99.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

5863 readers
4162 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Who is still using raid? It's not 2006.

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I have something resembling RAID5 in my NAS. 4 drives, 1 drive failure tolerance.

[–] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

👋

raidz2 here. Still learning. What alternative should I look into?

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

Unless you want to go to large scale cluster storage systems, nothing.

Raid is the best way to get disk-level redundancy for a disk volume.

I'm mainly using RAID 6, but I'm still using a lot of SATA drives. I'll probably need to go with one of the software raids, like z2 when I move away from SATA.

Raid is no longer viable as a performance component, but it is completely viable for redundancy. Large scale cluster storage like Ceph is the way forward for anything larger than what can fit in a single chassis, or a single disk controller. Basically if you have or need more than one 45 drive chassis for storage, look into Ceph.

For everything less, RAID, and if you don't need redundancy and just want performance, just get a high end NVMe drive and do backups.