Emulation

3545 readers

64 users here now

Community to talk about emulation & roms.

RULES:

1.) No bigotry

LINKS:

Emulation Wiki - Your source for everything emulation :)
[WIP] Emulation Links Wiki - My personal wiki for emulation links, please help contribute!
r/Roms Megathread - Megathread of Roms
RetroArch - RetroArch is the popular front-end to libretro which is a simple API that allows for the creation of games and emulators.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

lnxprcy@lemmy.ml

Was this BS always in the EULA ? (lemmy.world)

submitted 10 hours ago by JoeKrogan@lemmy.world to c/emulation@lemmy.ml

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Specifically the emulation part.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

You're asking for a blanket statement from me but giving specific examples.

Regarding what you said before the quote block, yes. My generic objection to EULAs would be lifted in this case.

Regarding the obviously objectionable example clauses in the block and after it, I am opposed to those but they are a reason to reject the particular EULAs which contain them, just like any contract which contains similar dispositions (imagine having to agree never to eat at Burger King when you buy a Big Mac).

My previous comment was about things that are generally wrong with the practice of EULAs because they have become a de facto standard, and was not meant to imply that those are the only things that can possibly be wrong with any EULA ever.