this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
38 points (93.2% liked)

Privacy

32159 readers
579 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For example using privacy screen protectors or phone cases with a manual shutter over the camera.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brimnac@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You sure that’s been ruled on? Not arguing, only feel like I’ve seen a lot more instances of police violating that than hearing they couldn’t do it.

Edit: my apologies, you’re right. I was able to check into it and see recent rulings. Warrant levels may vary, but they need a warrant.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Despite username similarities, I'm not Legal Eagle, nor do I have a legal background. Though I would be very much surprised if authorities in the US could search anybody's phone at will without consent, warrant, or reasonable suspicion.

[–] DrWeevilJammer@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

This very much depends on the state. Some state courts (California) have ruled that one can refuse a request to unlock a phone via biometrics, while others (Minnesota) have ruled that you do not have the right to refuse.

My understanding is that a passcode or PIN can be considered "testimony", because you have to communicate this information, and testimony can't be forced.

But biometrics aren't always considered to be testimony, because it's something you ARE.