this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
254 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

60036 readers
2951 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I'm not surprised. Ukraine has taught us that drones can be a cheap and shockingly effective attack vector for ships.

If you find out that for $200 or often less you can remotely deploy a drone that sinks a ship, you're obviously going to look into defensive measures.

[–] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago

The drones attacking ships in Ukraine are boats loaded with explosives, and they cost much more than $200

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 3 days ago

If you fly in maverick into a ship all it's going to happen is you're going to have a broken maverick. The drones attacking ships in Ukraine are kamikaze boats, not flying vehicles.

I don't think some random nobody with a vendetta is going to be able to get hold of one