Fedigrow

1029 readers

34 users here now

To discuss how to grow and manage communities / magazines on Lemmy, Mbin, Piefed and Sublinks

Resources:

https://lemmy-federate.com/ to federate your community to a lot of instances
!fedibridge@lemmy.dbzer0.com to organize overall fediverse growth
!reddit@lemmy.world to keep tabs on where new users might come from :)

founded 10 months ago

MODERATORS

Blaze@lemm.ee

threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works

103

How Lemmy public modlog allows to call out toxic and troll users, and should we have a community about this? (feddit.org)

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Blaze@feddit.org to c/fedigrow@lemm.ee

94 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I noticed today an occurence of a user complaining about Lemmy being worse then Reddit. The modlogs shows how toxic they are. When this was pointed out, the user deletes their account

https://web.archive.org/web/20241217101003/https://sopuli.xyz/post/20276017?scrollToComments=true

Deleted account: https://kbin.melroy.org/u/Pyrin

This seems to address the question that comes up once in a while "a public modlog is only useful for mods" (https://feddit.org/post/4920887/3235141), while we can see from this example that it can also be useful for toxic users.

As you may know, !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com is a community dedicated to calling out power tripping mods.

Should we consider having a similar community for toxic users?

There is already !fediverselore@lemmy.ca, but I feel like the "lore" is more about large-scale events (like the cats wave recently) than specific users events.

Edit: Updated the title, and put the emphasis on creating a community to call out toxic users rather than "dunking" on the users that was banned.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Mechaguana@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Maybe when you immediately knew who was speaking, but ever since people started talking with anonymous accounts, I think this belief needs serious reconsideration.