this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
967 points (93.8% liked)

Comic Strips

12948 readers
2985 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Sorry, that doesn't prove that there were no armed people in the majority of those situations. That's not how statistics work. It is not an even distribution and I don't think you're stupid enough to believe it is. You made an unprovable assertion.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

That's certainly one way to weasel out of the uncomfortable truth that statistics about owning any consumer good over a broad population in a capitalist system is not evenly distributed.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 57 minutes ago (1 children)

You're the one who doesn't want to engage, you can't then claim I'm "weaseling out." You've put forth no counter argument to argue further, this is your doing not mine, I'm just refusing to play your silly game.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 54 minutes ago (1 children)

I'm engaging with you this entire time and "that is not an even distribution" is literally a counter-argument. You just don't like it.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 39 minutes ago (1 children)

If it helps to use the 8% verifiable "CCW holders" then fine, there's still a low likelihood that any given person there has a gun to respond. The fact that you don't believe in "probability" isn't really my issue, everyone else understands it just fine.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 36 minutes ago (1 children)

Are you "refusing to play my silly game" or are you accepting that I am engaging with you and making a counter-argument and will continue to discuss this with me?

Because it can't be both.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 28 minutes ago (1 children)

I'm refusing to play by reiterating my original point and elaborating on said silly game of "nuh uh estimations and mathematical probability are fake news." Check your house for gas leaks.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 26 minutes ago* (last edited 25 minutes ago) (1 children)

And now that you've decided to hurl insults, we're done here.

Incidentally, a gas leak is one of the options I'm looking into in four to five years depending on the laws in Canada or certain other countries. Shall I let you know?

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 minutes ago (1 children)

We've been done, you just refuse to shut up when someone politely declines your silly bullshit lol.

"Depending on the laws..." is it only legal to kill yourself or others with a gas leak in Canada? You planning on starting a gas leak? Not sure I want to know what you mean by that weird ass sentence but if you're experiencing suicidal or homicidal ideation of some sort please seek help, it's never the option you should take. I don't like you and don't let me know, but someone does I'm sure and I hope you get the help you need.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago

If you don't like me, wouldn't you want to know?

I’m sure and I hope you get the help you need.

That's exactly what the medically-assisted euthanasia will be doing, so thank you. I thought you didn't like me.