this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
1452 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

60053 readers
3399 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's all made from our data, anyway, so it should be ours to use as we want

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The issue with this definition is that it's overly broad. For instance, a hash of a picture could not exist without that picture. Nor do certain downscalings, like 2x2, 3x3 or 4x4. There must be an exact pixel value you can legally downscale any image to without violating copyright. Similarly, there is a point where creating a book's synopsis starts violating copyright and where a song sounds too similar to another one.

And based on their size, LLMs - in my opinion - cannot possibly violate copyright for their source material because they couldn't possibly store more than a couple of bits per work. Only works that occue frequently in the training data can actually be somewhat reproduced by LLMs.

By the way, fair use doesn't even exist in every - including my - jurisdiction.

This has lead to people being successfully sued for copyright infringement because they posted pictures of their home online that contained a copyrighted wallpaper in the background.

[โ€“] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I'm in the US, as are most of these companies, so that's generally what's being discussed here. I don't have any experience with other countries' copyright law.

But for the US, it's intentional that there isn't an exact objective threshold. The fair use tests are subjective, to allow use of a copyrighted work in artistic and other non-commercial uses. And, as you mentioned, incidental inclusions in personal photos.