this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
299 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

60109 readers
2414 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
299
Google to court: we’ll change our Apple deal, but please let us keep Chrome (www.theverge.com)
submitted 3 days ago by avieshek@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
76 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Google is offering a far more pared-down solution to the court’s ruling that it illegally monopolized search

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nous@programming.dev 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

should a third-party acquire control over chrome's development, mv3 gets shredded. restrictions and limitations on adblockers get scaled-back or reverted outright.

That is far too optimistic. If the courts force a sale then a for profit company will but it expecting a return on investment. Which very likely means more monetisation efforts like embedding ads or even more tracking built into it. It is a fantasy to think who ever gets it will scale anything you dislike about it back.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago

I'd be interested in what restrictions are between those two companies, because it seems to me like there'd be a lot of money in making Chrome what Google wants it to be.

I'm already out. Linux desktop, Firefox browser. It's enough for me. Fuck MS, fuck Google, fuck Apple.

[–] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Unless they monetize the wanted Features Like Ad-Blocking. 10$/Month for No Ads everywhere is a Deal that many people would probably Take. Sponsorblock, DeArrow, Video Background Player Fix, there are many QoL Improvements that a Browser Company might include to sell a Browser Subscription or likewise

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Just like paying for no ads on prime video? I'd rather donate to one or more independent plugin developers.

[–] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago

Same

But there are a Lot of people Out there WHO pay 15$ for YouTube Premium, If you can get way better content for that Money elsewhere