this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
132 points (95.8% liked)

Europe

8324 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Being nude in public is technically legal (but only kinda*) in my country but I don't think forcing people to wear any clothes is comparable to banning specific types of clothes.

*It's basically legal as long as you're not offending anyone. So walking around naked around town might be legal, but anything you do could suddenly make it illegal.

This means that the law doesn't really have to be changed overtime since it's just based on what the general population thinks should be okay and not.

[–] letmesleep@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don’t think forcing people to wear any clothes is comparable to banning specific types of clothes.

There are differences, but I'd actually argue that only banning very specific clothing is a lesser infraction on liberty. If you really want to be nude, you have to ditch clothing altogether. With specific garments there tends to be some wiggle room. E.g. you might try to adhere to your religious rules by wearing a wig and baggy clothing.

Edit: I agree with you that it's based on the "offending portion" but that's the case with religious clothing in France. A lot of people there are offended by it.