this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
865 points (95.3% liked)

Comic Strips

13044 readers
2873 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 125 points 5 days ago (20 children)

If you compared this to humans ... the hording human would be guarding a pile of bananas the size of Mount Everest

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 69 points 5 days ago (13 children)

With 1500 other idiot chimps helping him guard it and call it "true ape nation".

[–] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (8 children)

Human society has never truly changed. This is literally what our civilization was built on.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

(Copying my comment on a similar, older post, because I really want to share this info again since I think it’s fascinating:)

The notion that the early formation of societies was based on security rather than empathy is outdated. Compassion has many evolutionary advantages, especially in primate species where offspring are born vulnerable. It’s clearly evident in other primates who live in groups (or ‘societies’), as a driving force of cooperation and group cohesion.

Here’s a recent paper (2022) by Penny Spikins, PhD at the University of York, Department of Archaeology, that explores how compassion shaped early human evolution and the formation of societies: The Evolutionary Basis for Human Empathy, Compassion and Generosity.

And here’s another from 2011 by Goetz et al that explores in detail the evolutionary advantages of compassion: Compassion: An Evolutionary Analysis and Empirical Review.

Those papers are both fascinating reads, and I highly recommend them for a deeper understanding of why and how empathy is crucial to our success as a species.

(For a couple of centuries, the narrative has been humans are warlike and that’s what dominated our development, but that’s simply not true. We’ve been that way for the past couple thousand years, but largely not before that. I’ll leave up to the reader what significant ‘development’ coincided with that shift in our overall behaviour.)

[–] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Good points, and great articles. Thank you.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)