this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
356 points (96.4% liked)

Greentext

4751 readers
1157 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 6 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Why scary? Wouldn't it be good if the human population didn't increase more?

[–] BugleFingers@lemmy.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

Yes and no, the way our society is built/structured can't handle negative growth. A lot of infrastructure and way of life/quality of life would suffer massively. That being said, pop growth also can't go up forever (while limited to earth). We actually have a ton of livable land left too, cities have learned how to be so super dense that it's eating all the rural area's populations in quickly developing places (It's where all the jobs and opportunities are -cities). Estimates suggest we will top off around 10 billion people

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The west is already on it, how do we propagate it elsewhere?

[–] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Fertility rates are on the decrease everywhere.This doesn't mean that population is decreasing, population increases as long as the fertility rate is superior to 1, which is still the case in a large portion of the world, but I think humanity on a global scale is expected to go beneath that treshold around 2050-2060.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

It's actually around 2.1 to keep the status quo.