this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2023
21 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37443 readers
495 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

just so this doesn't overwhelm our front page too much, i think now's a good time to start consolidating discussions. existing threads will be kept up, but unless a big update comes let's try to keep what's happening in this thread instead of across 10.

developments to this point:

The Verge is on it as usual, also--here's their latest coverage (h/t @dirtmayor@beehaw.org):

other media coverage:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Looks like the Chinese "investor" is the Communist Party. The actions Reddit is taking are pretty much how they take down all the companies and citizens they target.

[–] animist@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I swear tankies and liberals are basically the same. Tankies blame the CIA for every single bad thing that has ever happened while liberals blame the CCP and the Russian government. SOMETIMES BUSINESS PEOPLE ARE JUST GREEDY AND SOMETIMES AMERICANS ARE JUST SHITTY, there doesn't need to be a secret cabal behind everything

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

SOMETIMES BUSINESS PEOPLE ARE JUST GREEDY AND SOMETIMES AMERICANS ARE JUST SHITTY, there doesn’t need to be a secret cabal behind everything

while i'll wait for the source i asked for and gladly correct this if i'm presuming incorrectly, i'd bet the odds are high that "CCP" is just being used as a shorthand/stand-in for a company like TenCent, because that happens a lot in discussions about China and it's really goofy.

[–] FistfulOfBottlecaps@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the interest of fairness, isn't the difference between TenCent and the Chinese government basically just paperwork? I've always heard (anecdotally) that they work extremely close with the CCP.

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

In the interest of fairness, isn’t the difference between TenCent and the Chinese government basically just paperwork? I’ve always heard (anecdotally) that they work extremely close with the CCP.

i don't know if i'd go that far? with Tencent specifically it is inarguable they have worked with the Chinese government on some things and that's not nothing. but Tencent is still an independent company, and governments and corporations/their shareholders frequently don't have the same interests at heart, so it's hard to say where to draw the line here.

i think my position would be: i don't think it's useful to assert everything they do is intended to advance what China wants, especially in the absence of anything indicating that. i also don't know how useful it is to assume they're just a front for China--certainly i don't think that the people most vocal about this consistently apply that concern to other countries like Saudi Arabia who use companies to advance their state interests all the time.

conversely, i think it's ridiculous to confidently assert Tencent have never, or don't ever, get influenced by interests China has, or that Chinese state officials aren't capable at least theoretically of using the company to advance state interests. that stuff happens here, where ostensibly our system exists to prevent that kind of collaboration (this is basically what the "military-industrial complex" is, for example).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)