You were going for some Socratic roundabout ironic thing?
No.
That feels a bit patronizing.
That was not my intent. I apologize if anyone felt this way.
You were going for some Socratic roundabout ironic thing?
No.
That feels a bit patronizing.
That was not my intent. I apologize if anyone felt this way.
There! That's much better! I agree and well done.
Initial meetings and other communications like where to meet in person, etc.
I don't believe you read the article nor gave this any thought before you made your flippant comment. Also, you give no reasoning for your dogmatic statements.
Interesting. I was not aware that Peter is as you say he is. I can see it now. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I will no longer be watching his videos.
Several factors determine which countries will be least affected by climate change, including geographical location, existing infrastructure, and government policies. Some countries, like New Zealand, Finland, Denmark, Sweden, Switzerland, and Singapore, are often cited as being more resilient to climate change impacts. These nations tend to have robust infrastructure, strong economies, and a proactive approach to climate adaptation and mitigation.
Or move to New Zealand.
I listen to KEXP for several hours every day.
I've been exposed to the news cycle my entire life and I don't know how I missed the NASA Artemis project. I'm not sure why you'd think Peter is disingenuous. He's just a guy that loves to make documentary films.
Yes. Those are good points.