this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
190 points (96.6% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5246 readers
338 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
190
Climate-changing human activity could lead to 1 billion deaths over the next century, according to new study (phys.org)
submitted 1 year ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
30 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] currentbias@open-source-eschaton.net 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

@ConfuzedAZ "385,000 people are born every day"

For now

[–] ConfuzedAZ@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah. Don't blame people at all for not having kids. Frankly the planet probably needs less humans.

[–] Alto@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The planet can absolutely support more humans.

We'd just have to be something that even halfway resembles responsible about it. Good luck with that part

[–] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

The planet can absolutely support more humans.

As the world becomes more industrialized and its citizens desire more of the "first world life", I'm starting to be wary of that view.