simpsonsshitposting

3032 readers

838 users here now

I just think they're neat!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

PartyCat@sh.itjust.works

594

Maybe a bit optimistic, but one can dream (slrpnk.net)

submitted 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) by Prunebutt@slrpnk.net to c/simpsonsshitposting@sh.itjust.works

170 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Duff CEO with a Windows-Logo on his forehead: "Gamers use Windows because of its' user experience not our de facto monopoly."

Next Image: Duff CEO with Windows-Logo in front of a "Out of Business" sign. Subtitle: "30 minutes after SteamOS is released"

Edit: Yo, I'm not saying this is gonna happen. I just want to say that Windew's UX sucks ass.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I am an idiot, so this is probably a dumb question, but it sounds like you might be able to shine some light.

Why could we not run kernel level anticheat in a sandbox? Does kernel level inherently mean a sandbox cannot contain it?

As an aside is kernel level anticheat required for anti-cheat to function? Or are the developers of anti-cheat software just doing kernel level because its easier?