this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
317 points (93.2% liked)

2meirl4meirl

1113 readers
122 users here now

Memes that are too meirl for /c/meirl.

Rules:

  1. Respect the community. If you're not into self-deprecating/dark/suicidal humor then this place isn't for you. Kindly just block and move on. This is just how some of us cope.

  2. Respect one another.

  3. All titles must begin with 2meirl4meirl. This is for multiple reasons. One is just so you can be lazy with titles but another is so people who aren't into this kind of humor can avoid it.

  4. Otherwise just the general no bigotry, no dickishness, no spam, no malice, etc stuff.

Sidebar will be updated when I feel like and considering I'm Sadboi extraordinaire we'll see when that will be.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

So 50 is, superwhore?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Beacon@fedia.io 31 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Well there are also a few who are way above the average dragging it back up again. We need to see a distribution curve

[–] isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

This is still a bit misleading visually, because the population numbers for the bars are totalled, not distributed among the partner counts within each category. Eg. each partner count within the 2-10 partner bar has an average of ~5% of the population, which is less than the 0-partner bar, but they add up to ~45%, more than the 1-partner bar.

[–] Webster@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Red line appears to be total by specific percentage (maybe smoothed?)

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Oh yeah, true! Although that reveals that we're missing fine-grained data above 0 and 1, so even with smoothing it's not very detailed

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 2 points 2 weeks ago

Perfect! Thanks!

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

For every person who fucked 30 people, you need 6 people who never had sex to bring the average back to 5. I find 5 to be impossibly low, even as someone who's number is 5.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Eyy... How you doin', eh?

(Sorry. "Beacon" and "distribution curve"? I couldn't not.)