this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
457 points (91.0% liked)

Technology

60507 readers
4175 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
457
U.S. TikTokers flock to Xiaohongshu, baffling and bonding with Chinese users. (restofworld.org)
submitted 2 days ago by 000@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
401 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Americans are joining the Chinese social media app en masse to protest an imminent TikTok ban.

  • American users have flocked to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu in defiance of security warnings.
  • Chinese and American users have engaged in surprisingly friendly conversations about each other’s lives.
  • The influx of American users could burden Xiaohongshu’s censorship mechanism, experts say.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Where evidence?

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world -1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

There have been multiple studies that have demonstrated that pro-CCP content outweighs anti-CCP content by at least 3 to 1. Even on profiles that prefer anti-CCP content the pro content still gets suggested at a 3 to 1 ratio.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Surely you'd be willing to share those studies then? Because the only one I've seen was NCRI who didn't make that claim and are hilariously biased.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

No. I'm not doing research for you. Even if I did, we both know you'd either dismiss it or ignore it. I'm a nobody to you and you're already biased against what I have to say.

We won't see eye to eye on this. We simply won't agree. It would just be a waste of my time.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not asking you to do research. I'm asking you to show research you've presumably already done.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I don't keep links to things I've read over the years. You really think I have a folder on my desktop labelled "CCP Propaganda Proof" with various docs and links?

[–] NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml -1 points 10 hours ago

I'm surprised you dont.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I think you should if you're going to make such statements. All you need to do is save your comments where you've used those links. Then you can link to those comments.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world -1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

No. I don't "make such statements" as my day job. I'm not trying to prove anything to you. This is the most interaction I'm going to have on this topic.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

So you just spread misinformation on purpose and run away when pressed?

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Prove it's not misinformation.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago

I think you have that reversed. You're the one with the provable position.