this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
121 points (98.4% liked)

Seattle

1602 readers
130 users here now

A community for news and discussion of Seattle, Washington and the surrounding area

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rivalarrival 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What "standard" do you think is being loosened for licensure?

Again, Oregon is not a constitutional carry state. They are a shall issue state, and have been since 1989.

For your argument to make sense (and be relevant to this discussion), Oregonians would have to be significantly more likely to commit violent crime than the people of the the 29 "constitutional carry" states that don't even require licensure.

But they aren't.

Nor are the citizens of the 8 "may issue" states particularly dangerous either.

The reality is that the "undesirables will get guns" argument has a long and unsavory history, but no basis in fact.

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

reread my first sentence and then ask why you replied

[–] Rivalarrival 2 points 2 days ago

This is a public forum. Others are reading along.