this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
688 points (99.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2114 readers
936 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 day ago (8 children)
[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 1 day ago (3 children)

A list that includes everyone is useless from a data analysis point of view.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait, how? Because I only know about statistics and you usually want a comprehensive list to work with either partially or in bulk.

[–] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 16 hours ago

I think the point of big data is to collect enough information to extrapolate other qualities about whatever you want to know, so if everyone is on the list then you have no patterns to go off of besides "on Earth" or "in X country".

Side comment: if 99% of people were on the list, the the govt could just oppress everyone with a 99% accuracy rate. It's entirely possibly they could pick a proportion drastically lower than 99%

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)