this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
34 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7412 readers
348 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

You know, the "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" argument being implicitly extended to cover second-generation immigrants should if taken seriously, imply that these people aren't actually obligated to follow US law, which presumably includes immigration law. You know, if you go by a text-first originalist interpretation of the constitution and the law.