this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
54 points (95.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5598 readers
470 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
54
You don’t have to be a net zero hero – how focus on personal climate action can distract from systemic problems (theconversation.com)
submitted 1 day ago by neme@lemm.ee to c/climate@slrpnk.net
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 13 points 1 day ago

What happens when system problems conflict with your personal action/inaction/"lifestyle"?

Because if you're not prepared for change and instead are dreaming of a high-carbon lifestyle, you are probably going to vote for cryptofascists who promise more growth, the "American Dream" of car dependent suburbia as ~~cheap~~ affordable, cheap huge screens, cheap meat, cheap eggs, cheap cheese, cheap private commuting, cheap road infrastructure, cheap parking, cheap office space, cheap flights, cheap tourism, cheap low efficiency devices, and so on, while you get into conspiracies about 15 minute cities, plant-based diets (plus insect protein), and others.

Indeed, the carbon footprint calculator itself was developed in 2004 by a public relations firm working for BP. The tool encouraged individuals to calculate their personal impact on the environment, focusing on activities like driving, energy use, and diet.

The carbon footprint existed before that calculator tool was created as a practical measure in the scientific literature. You can usually find it as "GHG emissions per capita".

The same goes for the ecological footprint and its calculators. These weren't invented by fossil fuel corporations, they were used by them for PR.

The message from the Fossil PR isn't that you're guilty, it's that they own you because you are dependent on their product.

What I'm saying is that people need to be ready to end the addiction, to go through the withdrawal. That's a kind of bravery that isn't fostered by consumerism with its convenience obsession. Otherwise, people will just vote out anyone who tries to do something about the systemic problems, and vote in the liars who deny climate change and other systemic problems.