this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
330 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

61227 readers
4580 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
330
Democrat teams up with movie industry to propose website-blocking law (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 day ago by some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
72 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Lofgren's bill would impose site-blocking requirements on broadband providers with at least 100,000 subscribers and providers of public domain name resolution services with annual revenue of over $100 million. The bill has exemptions for VPN services and "similar services that encrypt and route user traffic through intermediary servers"; DNS providers that offer service "exclusively through encrypted DNS protocols"; and operators of premises that provide Internet access, like coffee shops, bookstores, airlines, and universities.

Invest in VPN providers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] michaelc@social.rootaccess.org 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

@some_guy is there such a thing as an open source dns and encrypted DNS? Or federated DNS?

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's actually surprisingly centralized.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Name_System#Structure

[–] Tanoh@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

It sort if have to be. In the end there has to be one source of truth for each TLD, otherwise who is to say who owns foo.com, and what it resolves to?

And then the same structure for assigning TLD ownership.

But there is nothing stopping you from running another DNS service, call it DNS2 with different root servers, etc. It is just going to be extemely hard to convince people to use it.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I use a self hosted pihole for DNS. It needs an upstream DNS server for resolving unchached dns's. I have pihole point to quad9 then cloudflair then google then I have it point to a bunch of unfiltered DNS servers across the world.

[–] justlemmyin@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Pihole also let's you install unbound. Your own recursive resolver. So you don't have to rely on google or quad9 etc.

https://docs.pi-hole.net/guides/dns/unbound/

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 2 points 19 hours ago

Cool I might do that. I assume I can find a docker compose somewhere.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

They're absolutely is, it's called onion routing, get around DNS blocks with tor as long as you know where you're going.