this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
167 points (91.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35834 readers
1210 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Pentagon Is Accelerating AI and Autonomous Technology America’s military leaders are racing to deploy thousands of autonomous weapons and an AI-powered air monitoring system for Washington D.C.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ProfessorZhu@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There really would be no way to have an interface that shuts it down, that an AI wouldn't be able to compromise. Though I imagine the military will set up a plan to blow up it's connections to power and the internet should it go rouge.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People use the term AI too loosely. We don't actually have artificial intelligence. We have neural networks that can perform tasks based on training data, but it's not actually intelligent by any means. That said, fully autonomous systems have existed for decades already. Look up CIWS or CRAM.

[–] ProfessorZhu@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not going to get into a "no real Scottsman" arugement about the advancements in this field

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Good lord. You're talking about programs being smart enough to disable their own killswitch. That's not a fucking thing.

[–] Zippy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Worse. They are taking about a program that has some sort of motivation or desires to disable the kill switch. It is quite silly yet. Worst case is a program bug that somehow disables. That would be highly unlikely. Particularly in such a way it would be dangerous.

[–] Uncle_Sheo217@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wonder what would go down if a CWIS managed to go rogue. Like I know it’s literally impossible, but if it was what would it do? Would a Phalanx just fire 20mm at random? It’s an interesting hypothetical imo. Obv I agree with you that current tech is most def not even close to smart enough to disable their own programming

[–] Fosheze@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The Phalanx does auto target. It just can't fire on its own. They're designed to shoot down missiles and humans can't aim that fast so they're fully autonomous except for the fire control. From what I remember targets are assigned and prioritized by the AEGIS system on the ship but the Phalanx is designed to do all of the actual targeting on it's own so that if the ship targeting stuff is damaged it can still function perfectly fine without it.

Theres a short video out there of a phalanx targeting and tracking a passenger plane. Aparently they're also known to track birds and people walking around on the the ship.

So as far as one going rogue, all it would take is for the person in the control room to give it the fire command at the wrong time. Of course they fire at 4,500 rounds per minute and their large magazine only holds 1,550 rounds, so it's spree of carnage would be pretty short lived.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More likely, P.O. Malarky gets an ass full of hot lead because he forgot the reapply the lube during the previous maintenance.

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe if FC2 wasn't always gun decking his shit he'd have less ammo inside him.

[–] AmidFuror@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Better dead than rouge, I always say.