this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
828 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59087 readers
3145 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lemmypy@feddit.nl 113 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Step 1: Threads starts federating with mastodon

Step 2: mastodon users happily engage with threads, letting it become the biggest fediverse instance

Step 3: threads stops federating with mastodon

Step 4: mastodon users switch over to threads where all conversation is happening, leaving the fediverse deserted

[–] throws_lemy@lemmy.nz 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More than 5 million people signed up within hours, let's assume they will have 30 million users by the end of the month. I'm sure there are Mastodon users will consider switching to Threads.

https://www.marketing-interactive.com/meta-threads-garners-5-million-signups-in-first-few-hours

And not to mention the Threads app is a privacy nightmare. I'm sure they can figure out any fediverse user, If fediverse server remains federated with meta server.

One more thing, this mastodon server admin declined an invitation from meta

[–] iskaa02@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

51 million already

[–] fbievan@fedia.io 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Plus knowing meta, they'll problary select a handful of instances to federate with. Meaning this plan is stupid.

[–] fbievan@fedia.io 0 points 1 year ago

I also might be underestimating people's ability to actaully use a platform. Idk

[–] fbievan@fedia.io 0 points 1 year ago

I've spent way too long thinking about this.

[–] speaker_hat@lemmy.one 15 points 1 year ago

It's already happened in the past, it will happen in the future.

[–] fbievan@fedia.io 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Mastodon.social is the biggest instance

There's plenty of conversation already existing. Even my single user instance is barely keeping up.

Its not like this is how federation works, federation happens in 3 ways: a person follows a user, thus getting their posts, an instance follows a relay, which gets sent posts and spreads them back out like a vaccum, and 3rd boosting posts.

I don't see threads changing all that much if people don't follow those accounts, and or meta doesn't follow relays and send their posts out through relays.

[–] fbievan@fedia.io 0 points 1 year ago

I can't figure out what meta wants to actaully do.

I can't decipher fully.

If your a big instance and don't want to waste bandwidth, just block them.

If you want meta, block them from the federated timeline if you desire.

No one will guide you in what to do with your fedi instance.

[–] nave@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But Mastodon has less users than Threads already, if someone wanted to jump ship for more conversation wouldn’t they do it already? Heck, wouldn’t they have stayed on twitter?

[–] SpicyTofuSoup@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Plus if all a lot of people who you follow are on threads then it might be a more attractive option to just switch platforms so you can see their content again after meta defederates

[–] fbievan@fedia.io 0 points 1 year ago

Plus this isn't like its XMPP or something where people actaully care who they're talking to. I really don't.