this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
120 points (92.9% liked)

Anarchism

1732 readers
397 users here now

Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.

Other anarchist comms

Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
120
is the Guardian deliberately avoiding the name Luigi? (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by merde@sh.itjust.works to c/anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Man charged with health insurance CEO murder to accept $300,000 in donations

Lawyer says 26-year-old accused ‘very much appreciates the outpouring of support’ on fundraising platform

Mangione “very much appreciates the outpouring of support”, said a statement on GiveSendGo that was attributed to his attorney, Karen Friedman Agnifilo.

There's only one occurrence of Luigi. The slogan was "free Luigi", not "free Mangione".

obligatory: I do not condone violence.

I just think that his was a political act like other historical regicides. Ravaillac is a historical name, like Luigi has now become. Why avoid it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True. This post is not telling the whole truth.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

this post is not "telling", it is questioning!

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The answer to any headline that's a question is "No".

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

not necessarily.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, your post confirms the law

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

not necessarily

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Except that it does. The answer to the question in your title is No.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago

if i make another post with the title

"Is the lemming earphone843 mature enough to participate in our conversations?"

the reply, according your rule, would be "no".

right?

[–] concrete_baby@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You just didn't read the article carefully.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

i did. I always do.