~> dig feddit.de any

; <<>> DiG 9.18.30 <<>> feddit.de any
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 49617
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 65494
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;feddit.de.			IN	ANY

;; Query time: 780 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.53#53(127.0.0.53) (TCP)
;; WHEN: Tue Feb 11 21:51:08 GMT 2025
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 38

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 34 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

You know it's the Fediverse when you see people using dig instead of nslookup.

[–] oleorun@real.lemmy.fan 23 points 4 weeks ago

No need to point a finger at anyone.

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 16 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I just don't dig the way nslookup outputs its answers.

[–] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It is the most unparseable. And are you using a Unix or Heil-Tim Cook-flavored variety?

Unrelated kinda but I use nslookup because I thought it was more widely supported out of the box than dig?

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 2 points 3 weeks ago

I use a GNU system, which as we all know isn't Unix.

Unrelated kinda but I use nslookup because I thought it was more widely supported out of the box than dig?

I don't think I've ever been in a situation where nslookup was available but dig wasn't. On Fedora, they're in the same package.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 9 points 4 weeks ago

Oh, that's new. Was definitely still running last time I checked 1 or 2 months ago.