this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
56 points (98.3% liked)

Gaming

20781 readers
23 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Shitty people are abundant in the creative industries, I have no delusions about that. Probably even more of those that have no public presence. But that has no bearing on whether or not he should retain sole ownership of his work. It's an entirely separate issue. Andrzej Sapkowski is also a massive douchebag, but nobody would deny that The Witcher is his property.

[–] Magnus@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

There are also some pretty chill creative people who don’t care about the money and the fame much. Even though having money is nice and makes your life much easier.

[–] MissGutsy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I totally agree. Problem is just that he legally sold it, so he kinda fucked himself on that. It's also interesting to see how nobody in that situation seemed to have good intentions, just a bunch of assholes all around

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm not convinced that is the case. The studio was purchased by a holdings company, then its CEO bought four early sketches of DE from the studio for pocket change. When Kurvitz, Rostov, and Hindpere (writer) objected, they were demoted and later fired. Unless another exchange took place, I don't see how this would amount to Kurvitz selling his rights; at the very least, he still owns Sacred And Terrible Air (with DE itself naturally belonging to the studio).

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

he legally sold it

I think it's a bit less cut and dry than that...