this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
16 points (100.0% liked)
Philosophy
107 readers
1 users here now
For everything and anything pertaining to philosophy.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't really have a well fleshed out idea to add, but you made me see a parallel of applying dialectics to itself and Godel's incompleteness theorem. Though I'm not sure if Godel's theorem applies as it is for axiomatic systems, which I'm not sure if dialectics is one?
It does make me think though, what is the natural outcome of applying dialectics to itself and does it result in some paradox?
It’s not a unified system that follows a set of logical postulates dogmatically according to certain rules. That sort of thinking always results in intractable paradoxes, while dialectics is the study of paradoxes. We see that we can describe reality through paradoxes and learn from experience to predict what will happen better and better, but it’s not concrete and ultimately we will see and study what happens in reality beyond our assumptions. We acknowledge that we ourselves are a constantly moving part of a system with factors no less than the sum totality of all that has happened in the universe.