this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
229 points (98.7% liked)

CanadaPolitics

2174 readers
300 users here now

Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MrSilkworm@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Implementing a UBI is a net positive action.First year of implementation would bring some inflation, but after that hings would propay get micb better.

An alternative would be to implement a global UBI at first. A global UBI would be about 30 USD per month and would eradicate extreme poverty worldwide at once

then nations could choose to implement a second part that wwohld increase the ammount to any level, preferably to a 75% of living wage.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Conservatives believe it will cost them their cultural purity. Purity is a huge issue for the conservative mind. Progressives and conservatives are both concerned with fairness, but the conservative version of fairness is more like making sure the right people get punished. Poor people need to suffer for the crime of being poor.

[–] bayesianbandit@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I always found it funny in the mid-2010s when the central bank was struggling to meet inflation targets why nobody seemed to suggest UBI could help fix that... seems to me that giving people money directly is at least as stimulating to the economy as dropping interest rates. Difference is one benefits capitalists, while the other benefits the working class...

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago

maybe they should allow us to do fractional reserve spending to invent new money ;)