this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
116 points (88.7% liked)

FediLore + Fedidrama

2580 readers
219 users here now

Rules

  1. Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
  2. When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
  3. The poster must have a credible post and comment history before submitting a piece of history. This is to avoid sock-puppetry and witch hunts.

The usual instance-wide rules also apply.


Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

you have to respect everyone's pronouns, even if you think they are trolling, because its not up for debate and you don't get to set conditions before you start calling someone by the right [...].

The issue is, they are up to debate. You cannot have your pronoun be a 1000 character long word, or a slur, and expect other people to respect it, even though they can, few probably will.

The existence of these obvious scenarios means that you shouldn't claim to respect everyone's pronouns, when there are times where you wouldn't.

Respect of pronouns is not binary. It is a gradient. An instance or community can choose rules somewhere on the gradient, but if you choose to allow all, then you will suffer similar issues to those who who claim to "tolerate all" types of behavior on their instance.

Just don't choose an absolute stance, and then these issues won't arise.

[โ€“] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 4 points 23 hours ago

Yeah. I get where the whole "we're going to make a hard-and-fast universal rule" decision came from. But that's just not how life works. You have to leave room for people to make decisions based on their own common sense and judgement, and resist the temptation to lay down a rule for them that they MUST ALWAYS FOLLOW OR THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES to make everything simple and conflict-free.

I have moved on from the whole debate, lest I get in trouble and cause pointless drama. But yes, that is exactly the crux of the matter.