this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
67 points (97.2% liked)
Asklemmy
42603 readers
757 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ya and if we all lived in the forest the world wouldn't be heating up. If we all gave our money to charity there wouldn't be any homeless. If we all didn't go to work the capitalist system would collapse.
But you know as well as I do that it isn't going to happen. Like I said, this individualistic approach to "changing things" is used as a deliberate distraction.
It's meant to take advantage of people's sense of responsibility. Nothing will ever change. If people stopped using Amazon then Walmart would step in to fill the void. It's a Medusa's head. The only way to ensure worker's rights is to write it into the law. Anything else is moral grandstanding. Which I think is even more distasteful when done to working class people.