Communism101

1366 readers

1 users here now

This is a community for those who are new to or unfamiliar with communist, socialist or simply leftist philosophy. Ask basic questions here and learn about what we stand for!

Rules:

Keep things SFW!
Keep posts and comments civil.
Don't attack someone for not knowing "enough" about communism or leftism.
Civil discussion and debate is welcome, trolling and hate speech is not.
No racism, sexism, homophobia, inciting crime/violence, etc.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

redjoker@lemmygrad.ml

FPGA@lemmygrad.ml

Should communists support the actor's strike? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by aloeha@lemmy.world to c/communism101@lemmygrad.ml

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I support the writer's guild strike because they are not part of the bourgeoisie. The same can't be said of a lot of these rich actors who own a ton of capital themselves. So on the one hand, it kind of seems like the bourgeoisie is fighting the bourgeoisie on this one. On the other hand, not every actor in the guild is as successful as Tom Cruise, so some of those striking actors are working class.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] jkure2@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Plenty of labor org's have wealthier people running them

This part merits plenty of discussion more broadly imo.

This doesn't change the fact that this labor action is good, striking now is a great move for sag aftra. Creating a class divide between union leadership and union rank and file is one of the most effective capitalist tools to undermine union solidarity. Cohesion is the only thing keeping any union standing; leftists should get and remain vigilant about this in the coming months and years as labor action becomes more and more prominent in America.

Big ups to the UAW for unseating incumbent leadership earlier this year, for example