Privacy

1531 readers

182 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

danielintempesta@programming.dev

[Meta] Should we consolidate this community with !privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com ? (lemmy.zip)

submitted 1 week ago by Blaze@lemmy.zip to c/privacy@programming.dev

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

!privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com has

900 users / day
1.58K users / week
2.86K users / month

This community has

61 users / day
220 users / week
483 users / month

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

which is a useful privacy tool as used by privacy focused services like grapheneos, mullvad, cryptomator, proton, Tor, signal, molly, etc

Don’t these use cryptography and not cryptocurrency? I think the rule is more about stuff like bitcoin which is (apart from monero) really bad for privacy because the transactions are more or less public

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The rule also bans discussing Monero which is rather good for privacy .

https://www.privacyguides.org/en/cryptocurrency/ - Monero is the only endorsed crypto currency from privacy guides.