this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
92 points (97.9% liked)

Privacy

34307 readers
1641 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

No photo

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Again, you vastly underestimate the size of Meta.

In the last quarter of 2024 it shows a net income of $20,838 million. A $20 million fine would change that 3 into a 1 and again, that's net income for just for three months.

Source: https://investor.atmeta.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2025/Meta-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2024-Results/default.aspx

[–] thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

How about a $1.2 Billion fine ? Would that perhaps be consequential ?

They got hit with that 2 years ago

https://dataprivacymanager.net/5-biggest-gdpr-fines-so-far-2020/

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Interesting, when you read that article, it says that Meta will appeal, searching for the GDPR fine and the appeal, all I found was more fines, but no records of the results of any appeals.

Also, it was €1.2 Billion, not $1.2 Billion.

[–] thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Appeal never lodged as far as I can find searching tje Irish high court lists. They lodged appeals against a €90m fine though which started hearing last week, and withdrew an appeal against a 2018 €251m fine

Yeah sorry, €1.2bn was USD $1.3billion at the time and about 1.25bn now, so hardly misleading though.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 1 points 22 hours ago

I only noticed the € vs $ because I was searching for the case, so all good.

It's telling that they continue to attract fines. I saw the ones you mentioned also but didn't have the energy to start digging.

Despite assertions made to the contrary in this thread, I'm not at all convinced that they're doing anything other than maximising shareholder value to the exclusion of all other considerations, including making a risk assessment in relation to paying fines versus compliance with the law.