Technology

2108 readers

120 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.

Rules

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. Use original link

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

3. Respectful communication

All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.

4. Inclusivity

Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.

5. Ad hominem attacks

Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.

6. Off-topic tangents

Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.

7. Instance rules may apply

If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.

Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

BrikoX@lemmy.zip

Utah becomes the first state to pass an app store age-verification bill and require parental consent for minors to download apps; the bill heads to the governor. (progresschamber.org)

submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by Tea@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.zip

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

definitions

(5) "App store" means a publicly available website, software application, or electronic service that distributes apps from third-party developers to users.

requirements

(1) An app store provider shall: (a) at the time an individual who is located in the state creates an account with the app store provider: (i) request age information from the individual; and (ii) verify the individual's age using commercially available methods that are reasonably designed to ensure accuracy;

I dont see how any anonymously accessible repository legally escapes the account and age verification requirement unless we assume that accounts are not required and therefore no check is possible.

the wording of the bill seems terrible - their definition of "mobile device" and "mobile operating system" are just plain stupid and could apply to your laptop running almost any OS.

it was just a quick parsing, but did I miss something in the bill that offers legal protection to non-commercial repositories?

edit: bill document

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I meant more that they wouldn't comply with the law, rather than it wouldn't apply to them.

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

totally fair, however I think these laws.should be treated as though they might apply and pushed back on appropriately. things have been weird for a while and are getting weirder.