this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2025
1879 points (99.2% liked)

Reddit

18994 readers
2788 users here now

News and Discussions about Reddit

Welcome to !reddit. This is a community for all news and discussions about Reddit.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


Rule 1- No brigading.

**You may not encourage brigading any communities or subreddits in any way. **

YSKs are about self-improvement on how to do things.



Rule 2- No illegal or NSFW or gore content.

**No illegal or NSFW or gore content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-Reddit posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



:::spoiler Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Share this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world 110 points 2 days ago (3 children)

With a quick google, what are the chances that erm71 is code for "Elon Reeve Musk 1971".
There no way that a tech savvy individual would do something as simple as use his name and DOB for usernames and email addresses... Whats his password "teslarulez1971!"?

[–] Dashi@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm sure that is exactly what it means. The point was to hide it a little bit, it's not the standard first.last of everyone else but to make it still uniquely identifiable as musk. It's not a completely unheard of practice to hide potential high spam targets. The goal isn't to completely hide, just make it slightly harder to find

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 2 days ago

This is why scraping LinkedIn works so well. Using the consistent email format gets you to your target easily. I've used it to get the contact info of the CTO of American Airlines before (his auto-reply included his cell number.)

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's security through obscurity, and it doesn't work in the long run.

[–] Dashi@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No it does not. Neither does having a password as they can be leaked or cracked or who knows what. Turning off tcmp echo on your router won't stop all bad actors but it will stop some. All security practices are just small steps to make it slightly harder for bad actors.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

There is no such thing as perfect security, but there's a big difference between trying to obscure something confidential between two parties (a password) and trying to obscure information that by design must be shared with other parties (an email address).

Outside of diligently using disposable alias addresses, obscuring an email is an exercise in futility. The biggest point of failure in security is the human, and all it takes is a single person to leak it. With all the people that need to communicate with Musk over email, the opportunity for that to happen is far higher than the chance of something like someone successfully cracking a hash.

[–] Dashi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I 100% agree with you. But I'll also admit that I email people ALL the time and I have no idea what their email alias is. I just hit reply.

I absolutely agree with you that even with a rotation musk's email alias will get leaked. I'm just agreeing with you that it was security through obscurification and it would have worked if one of the emails got leaked. A thousand people would have tried variations of elon.musk@ i am willing to bet none of them would have tried erm71@

And let's face it that man has an auto forward on his email lmao

[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

Obviously it's teslarulez69420!!!

[–] CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And why not? You forget there is beauty in brevity.

A breach is a breach is a breach is a breach. You'd be criticizing his choice whether it was 5 simple characters or 500. When you K.I.S.S. it makes it easier to remember AND quicker to enter, access. I had to choose a password for work once, and I made it a little complex....work constantly logged me out 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄...I had to enter that stupid fucking password so many fucking times, yes, it was secure. It was also DUMB and FRUSTRATING. Next 3 passwords were far simpler to repeatedly type in; I learned my lesson.

Same with Apple always auto-generating stupid passwords, I hope you never have to type them in! It's just dumb, as illustrated by XKCD.

XKCD also has a suggestion for strong, memorable, easy passwords.

Be smart. Make life simple. Don't do stupid things. 🫡

[–] SabinStargem@lemmings.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My rule: If I can't easily write nor remember a daily password, it is crap. My strong passwords are kept in a offline password manager, which has a relatively weak master password in the vein of "R!seaboveit@ll". Not ideal, but at least a human can type it.

The real danger is going to be websites leaking or sharing the individual password it is given. So long as no one knows your (offline) manager's pass, the threat can be cordoned off. Unfortunately, we can expect the integration of AI into OS ecosystems to make that method vulnerable. Say, for example, Microsoft's Copilot or Google's Android.

[–] CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 days ago

Ha, son of a bitch. That is almost exactly what I do. 😆

There are always vulnerabilities; you can't make things truly secure, you only make them less insecure.

All my passwords are longer & stronger, XKCD method, easy to read & type. Granted I don't have Apple or my password manager generating gibberish passwords for me, takes 20 seconds each, I think them up. Maybe you should try it, too, idk. Leave the gibberish behind. I'm so glad I did.