this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
213 points (85.4% liked)

Crazy Fucking Videos

6303 readers
361 users here now

Dive into the World of Insane Videos!

Rules

  1. No hate speech of any kind.
  2. Content warnings are required in post titles where applicable. Example: [CW: Injury]
  3. Use your best judgement and mark NSFW posts as such.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Were they actually breaking any law or did the government just decide it wanted to give them a beating?

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 minutes ago

Pretty sure nowadays in germany the palestanian flag basically counts as promoting a terrorist organization. So yeah they broke the law but the law is bullshit and still shouldnt allow the officers to exert physical violence.

[–] Peter_Arbeitsloser@feddit.org 12 points 13 hours ago

https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/berlin-polizei-ermittelt-in-mehr-als-30-faellen-nach-frauentag-demos-dpa.urn-newsml-dpa-com-20090101-250309-930-398564

"They are being investigated for particularly serious breach of the peace, liberation of prisoners, resisting law enforcement officers and using symbols of unconstitutional and terrorist organizations."[...]

"Seven officers were injured, but were able to continue their duties. Journalists were also attacked. 28 people were reportedly arrested." [...] "Participants also used umbrellas to block the view of a pro-Palestinian block. Some police officers were attacked with bottles, kicks and punches. Officers then “repeatedly used physical force”, it was reported."

[–] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 80 points 1 day ago

Maybe a hot take but if you are breaking the law, you should still not receive a beating.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The German state is incredibly repressive against solidarity for Palestine.

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Is it? We had many peaceful demonstrations.

When it got problematic was when people on demonstrations shoutet that they wanted a kalifat (don't know how to write the word) and "from the river ...", because Hamas and other people interpret it differently.

[–] Shezzagrad@lemmy.ml 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Tells me your brainwashed. You know the internet is free right, there's a boy younger than 10 being chased by 2 or 3 police men for having a Palestinian flag while he runs for his life and then is beaten. This "kalifat" bs you're talking about is just straight up lies

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com -3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You will find anything on the WWW, if you just look for it. Whether it's a person with a rainbow flag, a woman, or a person of any religion getting beaten up. Just open Twitter and there you go...

What do you mean bs? It was a video in which people demanded a kalifat for Palestine and the others wanted one in Germany. I do not say that everyone thinks like this. I have only described what was the situation here, what went through the media and press and that that was interpreted as a no-go here in Germany.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure that the people "demanding a Kalifat" won't be demonstrating on a women's march. O.o

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe, you misunderstood my comment:

Is it? We had many peaceful demonstrations. When it got problematic was when people on demonstrations shoutet that they wanted a kalifat (don’t know how to write the word) and “from the river …”, because Hamas and other people interpret it differently.

I did not state that the kalifat shouts happened during the protest you saw in that video. That was months ago. And it was not a protest for women at all. The participants were even separated by gender, if I remember correctly.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

But I'm not arguing for obvious islamists. I'm arguing that every Palestinian protest (even those on women's march) are suspicious for the German state.

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com -1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Maybe because of what happened months ago with the kalifat stuff?

I'm honest with you... I haven't heard much about that kind of protest lately in Germany and don't have insider knowledge what parts of the state, the government or the 16 sub-governments might find suspicious or not.

Let's just agree that it'd be good for everyone, if the protesters managed (maybe, they already did, I don't know) eliminating the islamists out of their groups.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 2 points 15 hours ago

Maybe because of what happened months ago with the kalifat stuff?

Nope, it's because of the "Staatsräson". Sudent protestors on German Unis most likely don't want anything to do with the kalifate.

Let's just agree that it'd be good for everyone, if the protesters managed (maybe, they already did, I don't know) eliminating the islamists out of their groups.

🙄

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

No those are government and media lies to justify the violence. Germany supplies 30% of the weapons for the genocide in Palestine. They are next to the US the most repressive country.

German police have beaten up protesters holding Palestinian flags without any cause. Many examples have been posted in this community. Example from 4 months ago https://lemmy.world/post/21657306 (Direct link to the video: https://imgur.com/SWM4K8H)

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not only happening on protests. People get exmatriculated or their visas revoked if they go to the wrong protest camp or post the wrong things on facebook. You can also get your citizenship denied if you have the wrong opinions on Iserael, since the IHRA is official stance of the state.

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think, this is a quite biased (at least not accurate) representation of what is happening.

You can probably find single examples of all of that above, e.g. for exmatriculation, but when you dig deeper, there are probably hurdles for that:

Konkret soll exmatrikuliert werden können, wer Gewalt anwendet oder dazu auffordert, wer wegen einer Straftat „zulasten eines Mitglieds der Hochschule“ rechtskräftig verurteilt wurde, oder wer Einrichtungen der Hochschule zu strafbaren Handlungen „nutzt oder zu nutzen versucht“

You can also get your citizenship denied if you have the wrong opinions on Iserael, since the IHRA is official stance of the state.

This "stance of the state" thing is not law. There were for sure public discussions about denying citizenship for people who oppose democracy or the right of Israel to exist. But let me be honest: If someone opposes democracy or freedom or thinks that Israel or any other country should be fully destroyed, I don't need such a person in my country. But if your opinion is that Netanyahu is an a-hole and that his far-right government buddies only want more war and death, no one will do anything with your citizenship because of that.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 day ago

You can probably find single examples of all of that above

Here's an interview of a student about how the state tries to break the protests.

Exmatriculation might be quite rare. But the Staatsschutz telling the BAMF to revoke visas, based on Facebook posts most certainly is not. It's just not the kind of things you're gonna read in the SZ, or Welt.

This "stance of the state" thing is not law.

Yes, because the German constitutional court wouldn't allow that kind of law. It is however a soft-power tool to shape political discourse in favour of Netanyahu.

There were for sure public discussions about denying citizenship for people who oppose democracy or the right of Israel to exist.

I findeyour faith in the organs of the state a bit naive.You can check out yourself how these decisions not to grant citizenship are carried out. If you ask me: most of the questions the judge uses to determine whether or not someone is "opposing democracy" wouldn't get a correct answer from most Germans.

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't know the context of the video.

But yes, covering your face on a demonstration is illegal and can lead to up to 1 year in jail.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vermummungsverbot

[–] punksnotdead@slrpnk.net 11 points 15 hours ago

Up to 1 year in jail and 20 punches to the face apparently...

[–] DaveyRocket@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

How are you going to build a fascist database of enemies if the protestors cover their face?