this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
626 points (99.5% liked)

Buy European

6543 readers
625 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat of this community


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content.

Useful Websites

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Friendica:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] KryptOrchid@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (14 children)

I'd agree with compelling politicians to change platform only in the case you outline above, where said politician (assuming they are democratically elected) is unreachable through other means of communication. Else I think everyone is free to make their own decision as to what platform/soapbox they want to use, just as much as I have the right to not use that platform.

[โ€“] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 3 points 4 months ago (13 children)

People donโ€™t have a right to use Twitter -- b/c itโ€™s a private company that excludes people (e.g. people without mobile phones). Thatโ€™s the first problem.

I heard a rumor that (like Facebook) Twitter was closing read access so only members could /read/ posts. Did that ever happen? Maybe not, because I was just able to reach a twitter timeline without having Twitter creds as a test. If that exclusivity plays out, then politicians will be writing messages that a segment of people are excluded from viewing. It would not be enough that they can be reached by other means. Politicians would also have to copy all of their messages to an accessible space somewhere.

Itโ€™s also insufficient that I can reach them outside twitter only by non-microblogging means. E.g. by letter. A letter is a private signal not seen by others. Microblogging is an open letter mechanism. Itโ€™s important to deliver your msg to a polician in a way that the msg has an audience. Take away the audience and you take away the power of the signal.

[โ€“] KryptOrchid@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (9 children)

People donโ€™t have a right to use Twitter.

I have a right to use twitter to the same extent as you have a right to use lemmy. Others not having a phone/computer should not infringe on my right to use existing technology, services or software.

The right to choose to use twitter is markedly different from making it a universal right to be able to access twitter.

Itโ€™s also insufficient that I can reach them outside twitter only by non-microblogging means.

Public protest existed for centuries prior to Twitter, and it's not as if the only choices are Twitter or private letter. There are many other channels of communication around, some of which public.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)