Asklemmy

46544 readers

932 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

How do you keep up to date on current events? (slrpnk.net)

submitted 19 hours ago by solbear@slrpnk.net to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

There's so much so-called "news", but most of it is just noise. In this situation, it seems easiest to either A) get consumed by it, trying to follow everything and reading every "he said what?"-piece posted or B) become more or less apathetic and avoid news altogether.

To be able to make proper choices and help move things in the right direction, B) is not an option, as you need to understand current events to at least a minimal level, but A) leaves you just as clueless, overflowing with useless information, with a heavily worn-down ability to be source critical, not remembering where you read any given "fact".

So how do you keep up to date with current events? Have you found a good way? Am I mistaken in my above assessment?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] guy@piefed.social 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Why not a middle-ground? Stay informed, but don't read everything?

I lean heavily towards A, but I don't read every newsflash there is. I tend to keep track of major events, reading up on past news if there's need for background information.

I don't need to hear everything Musk or Trump says, but if there's a major news that require some context I read up on that.

[–] solbear@slrpnk.net 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I think the problem is that the media reports everything Musk and Trump says, so having an effective way to filter through everything to get at what keeps me informed is not straightforward. This wouldn't be an issue if news outlets acted more as a filter and reported only on the more essential developments with proper analysis to go with it. In my country, the main page of our main news outlet will report Justin Bieber having a baby as breaking news on the front page, alongside notices of American "celebrities"' demise (I put it in quotes, because they need to refer to the character they played in a 90s sitcom because nobody knows their names), and five articles about the same unfolding event.

[–] guy@piefed.social 1 points 15 hours ago

Just eye the headlines and skip the ones not interesting?

"Justin Bieber is having a baby" is a headline read, and article skipped. Thus to amount of energy is given and you can focus on other news of more interest.