this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
95 points (84.7% liked)

World News

34685 readers
581 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's a fact.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dzsimbo@lemm.ee 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

plenty others had their regime changed or couped

While I do appreciate that Maidan brought a regime change and the many Hungarian protests haven't, so I keep the possibility of CIA intervention open there and can 'give you' that much. But which other Eastern European (or Baltic for that matter) had to be coaxed into Nato? Like where were there power grabs before the 2004 wave?

If it is a choice of going from sending troops to weird desert wars or having russian boots on Hungarian land, 10 times out of ten I'd choose the former.

We can disect the harm Soros caused the world, but I feel we see it from an opposing side. He funded Orbán and co. The same group that says it would have let the Russians in in '56 without resistance because that would have saved lives. It feels this is the main argument as well, against Ukraine: 'Stop hurting yourself'. You can say Orbán got smart and stood up to the old dude, but this part feels like speculation.

I am fairly sure I won't get convinced otherwise in this thread, but I do appreciate the civil tone. I am also in a lucky situation where things aren't going my way: if I'm right, I get to say it, if I'm wrong, Ukraine will be denazified and peace will reign in a new Russo-European collaboration of the likes I haven't seen before. Peace, hegemony.

Thanks for the talk. I'm open to further discussing views if you want/have the energy.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.ml 2 points 21 hours ago

Thanks for the civil talk, I too have to go now.
Will definitely come back to it.