this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
1676 points (98.8% liked)
Microblog Memes
7072 readers
2923 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
pfff. wrong.
1 third of all ppl have access to a washingmachine. there not enough resources to build one for everyone. or cars etc..
Couldn't we just share laundromats and busses?
good question in an otherwise delusional sub.
ofcourse your question has been asked and from what i remember not even the reddist leftwinger in the first world would give up on a washingmachine.
so im theory yes, but with real humans sharing does not work out.
If I give up my washing machine for a laundromat, does that mean we get to live in a utopia where that's my biggest problem?
doubt your altruism can compensate for the rest. it means some maga can buy one more suv/pickup/truck.
Well if we stopped building useless shit…
How much washing machines can you build for an average yacht’s worth of ressources time and energy?
Probably not enough but it’s not like there wasn’t other useless shit being made nor like a lot of households would not do just fine sharing a washing machine.
no doubt. but claiming there enough resources for a rising number of ppl is wrong and keeps points out of the discussion that might come in handy for humanity later. sure eat the rich, but ppl will still be hungry.