this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
173 points (81.9% liked)

World News

32324 readers
865 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The problem is you're trying to redefine censorship to fit your narrative.

censor

verb

censored; censoring ˈsen(t)-sə-riŋ ˈsen(t)s-riŋ

transitive verb

: to examine in order to suppress or delete anything considered objectionable

Suppressing speech, regardless of where or how, is censorship.

[–] Veraticus@lib.lgbt -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting point. But are you willing to put your theory into practice?

If you truly believe this, you must now end all your messages with:

"veraticus@lib.lgbt said that free-speech maximalism is for fools but I disagreed because I am a fool."

If you don't do this you are suppressing my speech and censoring me. And please don't object on the grounds that the content is, perhaps, objectionable to some; remember, objectionable content is especially worthy of free speech protections.

[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have no idea how you got this from what I said but no, that's not how any of this works.

[–] Veraticus@lib.lgbt -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stop censoring me. I know you might find the content objectionable, but my freedom of speech demands you include that phrase in all your posts from this moment on. You aren't going to suppress speech you don't like or agree with, are you?

[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Censorship doesn't mean refusing to repeat other people's speech. It means preventing others from speaking. Not sure what part of this you're not getting. It is not a difficult concept.